Registro:

Referencias:

• (1993) Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy., , Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science
• Abell, S.K., Anderson, G., Chezem, J., Science as argument and explanation: Exploring concepts of sound in third grade (2000) Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science, pp. 100-119. , Minstrell, J. & Van Zee, E.H. (Eds.), Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science
• Adúriz-Bravo, A., (2005) Una introducción a la naturaleza de la ciencia: La epistemología en la enseñanza de las ciencias naturales., , Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica
• Adúriz-Bravo, A., Argumentación científica escolar: Herramientas para su análisis y su enseñanza (2010) Seminario Internacional sobre Enseñanza de las Ciencias, , Plenary lecture presented at the, Cali, Colombia, June
• Adúriz-Bravo, A., Fostering model-based school scientific argumentation among prospective science teachers (2011) US-China Education Review, 8 (5), pp. 718-723
• Adúriz-Bravo, A., Bonan, L., González Galli, L., Revel Chion, A., Meinardi, E., Scientific argumentation in pre-service biology teacher education (2005) Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 1 (1), pp. 76-83
• Aliseda, A., (2006) Abductive reasoning: Logical investigations into discovery and explanation., , Dordrecht: Springer
• Allchin, D., Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science (2011) Science Education, 95 (3), pp. 518-542
• Archila, P.A., La investigación en argumentación y sus implicaciones en la formación inicial de profesores de ciencias (2012) Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 9 (3), pp. 361-375
• Asti Vera, C., Ambrosini, C., (2010) Argumentos y teorías: Aproximación a la epistemología., , Buenos Aires: CCC Educando
• Atkins, L.J., The roles of evidence in scientific argument (2008) AIP Conference Proceedings: 2008 Physics Education Research Conference, 1064, pp. 63-66. , Edmonton: American Institute of Physics
• Bar-Hillel, Y., (1970) Aspects of language: Essays and lectures on philosophy of language, linguistic philosophy and methodology of linguistics., , Jerusalem: The Magnes Press
• Bell, P., Linn, M.C., Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE (2000) International Journal of Science Education, 22 (8), pp. 797-817
• Bex, F.J., Walton, D.N., Burdens and standards of proof for inference to the best explanation: Three case studies (2012) Law, Probability & Risk, 11 (2-3), pp. 113-133
• Böttcher, F., Meisert, A., Argumentation in science education: A model-based framework (2011) Science & Education, 20 (2), pp. 103-140
• Bravo-Torija, B., Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., A learning progression for using evidence in argumentation: An initial framework (2011) 9th ESERA Conference, , Paper presented at the, Lyon, France, September
• Bricker, L.A., Bell, P., Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education (2008) Science Education, 92 (3), pp. 473-498
• Buty, C., Plantin, C., (2008) Argumenter en classe de sciences: Du débat à l’apprentissage., , Paris: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique
• Buty, C., Plantin, C., Introduction: L’argumentation à l’épreuve dans l’enseignement des sciences et vice-versa (2008) Argumenter en classe de sciences: Du débat à l’apprentissage, pp. 17-41. , Buty, C. & Plantin, C. (Eds.), Paris: Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique
• Cademártori, Y., Parra, D., Reforma educativa y teoría de la argumentación (2000) Revista Signos, 33 (48), pp. 69-85
• Candela, A., (1999) Ciencia en el aula: Los alumnos entre la argumentación y el consenso., , Mexico: Paidós
• Cavagnetto, A.R., Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts (2010) Review of Education Research, 80 (3), pp. 336-371
• Chevallard, Y., (1991) La transposition didactique: Du savoir savant au savoir enseigné., , Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage Éditions
• Clark, D.B., Sampson, V.D., Stegmann, K., Marttunen, M., Kollar, I., Janssen, J., Weinberger, A., Laurinen, L., Scaffolding scientific argumentation between multiple students in online learning environments to support the development of 21st century skills (2010) E-collaborative knowledge construction: Learning from computer-supported and virtual environments, pp. 1-39. , Ertl, B. (Ed.), New York: IGI Global
• Diéguez Lucena, A., (2005) Filosofía de la ciencia., , Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva
• Driver, R.A., Newton, P., Osborne, J.F., Establishing the norms of scientific argument in classrooms (2000) Science Education, 84 (3), pp. 287-312
• Duschl, R.A., (1990) Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development., , New York: Teachers College Press
• Duschl, R.A., La valoración de argumentaciones y explicaciones: Promover estrategias de retroalimentación (1998) Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 16 (1), pp. 3-20
• Duschl, R.A., Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria (2008) Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, pp. 159-175. , Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (Eds.), Dordrecht: Springer
• Duschl, R.A., Ellenbogen, K., Erduran, S., Understanding dialogic argumentation among middle school science students (1999) American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, , Paper presented at the, Montreal, Canada, April
• Duschl, R.A., Grandy, R., (2008) Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation., , Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
• Duschl, R.A., Osborne, J.F., Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse (2002) Studies in Science Education, 38 (1), pp. 39-72
• Erduran, S., Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., (2008) Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research., , Dordrecht: Springer
• Erduran, S., Simon, S., Osborne, J.F., TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse (2004) Science Education, 88 (6), pp. 915-933
• Fagúndez Zambrano, T.J., Castells Llavanera, M., La enseñanza universitaria de la física: Los objetos materiales y la construcción de significados científicos (2009) Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 9 (2), pp. 1-27
• Føllesdal, D., Walløe, L., (1986) Rationale Argumentation: Ein Grundkurs in Argumentations-und Wissenschaftstheorie., , Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (Norwegian original from 1977.)
• Galagovsky, L., (2008) ¿Qué tienen de “naturales” las ciencias naturales?, , Buenos Aires: Biblos
• García Romano, L., Valeiras, N., Lectura y escritura en el aula de ciencias: Una propuesta para reflexionar sobre la argumentación (2010) Alambique, 63, pp. 57-64
• Giere, R.N., (1988) Explaining science: A cognitive approach., , Chicago: University of Chicago Press
• Giere, R.N., Bickle, J., Mauldin, R.F., (2005) Understanding scientific reasoning, , (5th edition). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company
• Harpine, W.D., Can rhetoric and dialectic serve the purposes of logic? (1985) Philosophy and Rhetoric, 18 (2), pp. 96-112
• Henao, B.L., Stipcich, M.S., Educación en ciencias y argumentación: La perspectiva de Toulmin como posible respuesta a las demandas y desafíos contemporáneos para la enseñanza de las ciencias experimentales (2008) Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 7 (1), pp. 47-62
• Hodson, D., (2009) Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values., , Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
• Islas, S.M., Sgro, M.R., Pesa, M.A., La argumentación en la comunidad científica y en la formación de profesores de física (2009) Ciência & Educação, 15 (2), pp. 291-304
• Izquierdo-Aymerich, M., Hacia una teoría de los contenidos escolares (2005) Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 23 (1), pp. 111-122
• Izquierdo-Aymerich, M., Adúriz-Bravo, A., Epistemological foundations of school science (2003) Science & Education, 12 (1), pp. 27-43
• Izquierdo-Aymerich, M., Sanmartí, N., Espinet, M., García, M.P., Pujol, R.M., Caracterización y fundamentación de la ciencia escolar (1999) Enseñanza de las Ciencias, pp. 79-92. , extra issue
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., (2010) 10 ideas clave: Competencias en argumentación y uso de pruebas., , Barcelona: Graó
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., Duschl, R.A., “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Arguments in high school genetics (2000) Science Education, 84, pp. 757-792
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., Díaz de Bustamante, J., Discurso de aula y argumentación en la clase de ciencias: Cuestiones teóricas y metodológicas (2003) Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 21 (3), pp. 359-370
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., Erduran, S., Argumentation in science education: An overview (2008) Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, pp. 3-27. , Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (Eds.), Dordrecht: Springer
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., Federico-Agraso, M., Justification and persuasion about cloning: Arguments in Hwang’s paper and journalistic reported versions (2009) Research in Science Education, 39 (3), pp. 331-347
• Kelly, G.J., Bazerman, C., How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis (2003) Applied Linguistics, 24 (1), pp. 28-55
• Kelly, G.J., Chen, C., The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse (1999) Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (8), pp. 883-915
• Kelly, G.J., Takao, A., Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing (2002) Science Education, 86 (3), pp. 314-342
• Khine, M.S., (2012) Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice and research., , Dordrecht: Springer
• Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., Clark, R.E., Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching (2006) Educational Psychologist, 41 (2), pp. 75-86
• Konstantinidou, A., Cerveró, J.M., Castells, M., Argumentation and scientific reasoning: The “double hierarchy” argument (2010) Contemporary science education research: Scientific literacy and social aspects of science, pp. 61-70. , Taşar, M.F. & Çakmakci, G. (Eds.), Ankara: Pegem Akademi
• Kuhn, D., Thinking as argument (1992) Harvard Educational Review, 62 (2), pp. 155-179
• Kuhn, D., Science as argument (1993) Science Education, 77 (3), pp. 319-337
• Kuhn, D., Teaching and learning science as argument (2010) Science Education, 94 (5), pp. 810-824
• Kuhn Berland, L., Reiser, B., Making sense of argumentation and explanation (2009) Science Education, 93 (1), pp. 26-55
• Kuhn Berland, L., Reiser, B., Classroom communities’ adaptation of the practice of scientific argumentation (2011) Science Education, 95 (2), pp. 191-216
• Lawson, A.E., The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching (2003) International Journal of Science Education, 25 (11), pp. 1387-1408
• Lawson, A.E., What is the role of induction and deduction in reasoning and scientific inquiry? (2005) Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (6), pp. 716-740
• Lawson, A.E., Basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation, and discovery (2009) Science Education, 94 (2), pp. 336-364
• Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education (2006) Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, pp. 371-387. , Sawyer, R.K. (Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Lemke, J., (1990) Talking science: Language, learning, and values., , Norwood: Ablex
• Linhares Queiroz, S., Passos Sá, L., O espaço para a argumentação no ensino superior de química (2009) Educación Química, 20 (2), pp. 104-110
• Martins, I., Argumentation in texts from a teacher education journal: An exercise of analysis based upon the Bakhtinian concepts of genre and social language (2009) Educación Química, 20 (2), pp. 26-36
• Mason, L., Scirica, F., Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding (2006) Learning and Instruction, 16, pp. 492-509
• Matthews, M., (1994) Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science, , New York: Routledge
• Matthews, M., (2000) Time for science education: How teaching the history and philosophy of pendulum motion can contribute to science literacy., , New York: Plenum Publishers
• McDonald, C., The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views on nature of science (2010) Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (9), pp. 1137-1164
• Monk, M., Osborne, J.F., Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy (1997) Science Education, 81 (4), pp. 405-424
• Newton, P., Driver, R., Osborne, J.F., The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science (1999) International Journal of Science Education, 21 (5), pp. 553-576
• Nielsen, J.A., Dialectical features of students’ argumentation: A critical review of argumentation studies in science education (2011) Research in Science Education, , on-line first
• (1995) National science education standards., , Washington, DC: National Academy Press
• Nussbaum, E.M., Sinatra, G.M., Owens, M.C., The two faces of scientific argumentation: Applications to global climate change (2012) Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice and research, pp. 17-37. , Khine, M.S. (Ed.), Dordrecht: Springer
• Ogunniyi, M.B., Teachers’ stances and practical arguments regarding a science-indigenous knowledge curriculum: Part 1 (2007) International Journal of Science Education, 29 (8), pp. 963-986
• Ogunniyi, M.B., Hewson, M.G., Effect of an argumentation-based course on teachers’ disposition towards a science-indigenous knowledge curriculum (2008) International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3 (4), pp. 159-177
• Osborne, J., The role of argument in science education (2005) Research and the quality of science education, pp. 367-380. , Boersma, K. Goedhart, M., de Jong, O. & Eijkelhof, H. (Eds.), Dordrecht: Springer
• Osborne, J.F., Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse (2010) Science, 328, pp. 463-466
• Osborne, J.F., Erduran, S., Simon, S., Monk, M., Enhancing the quality of argument in school science (2001) School Science Review, 82 (301), pp. 63-70
• Osborne, J.F., MacPherson, A., Patterson, A., Szu, E., Introduction (2012) Perspectives on scientific argumentation: Theory, practice and research, pp. 3-16. , Khine, M.S. (Ed.), Dordrecht: Springer
• Osborne, J.F., Patterson, A., Scientific argument and explanation: A necessary distinction? (2011) Science Education, 95 (4), pp. 627-638
• Padilla, C., Escritura y argumentación académica: Trayectorias estudiantiles, factores docentes y contextuales (2012) Magis, 5 (10), pp. 31-57
• Plantin, C., (2005) L’argumentation: Histoire, théories et perspectives., , Paris: PUF
• Plantin, C., “No se trata de convencer sino de convivir”: L’ère post-persuasion (2011) Rétor, 1 (1), pp. 59-83
• Pontecorvo, C., Girardet, H., Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics (1993) Cognition and Instruction, 11 (3-4), pp. 365-395
• Revel Chion, A., Adúriz-Bravo, A., Meinardi, E., Análisis histórico-epistemológico de las concepciones de salud desde una perspectiva didáctica: Narrando la “historia” de la peste negra medieval (2009) Enseñanza de las Ciencias, pp. 168-172. , extra issue
• Revel Chion, A., Couló, A., Erduran, S., Furman, M., Iglesia, P., Adúriz-Bravo, A., Estudios sobre la enseñanza de la argumentación científica escolar (2005) Enseñanza de las Ciencias, extra issue VII Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en la Didáctica de las Ciencias, , Oral presentations, Section 4.1., n/pp
• Reygadas, P., Haidar, J., Hacia una teoría integrada de la argumentación (2001) Estudios sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas, 7 (13), pp. 107-139
• Ruiz, F.J., Márquez, C., Tamayo, O.E., Teachers’ change of conceptions on argumentation and its teaching (2011) E-book ESERA, pp. 86-92. , http://lsg.ucy.ac.cy/esera/e_book/base/ebook/strand6/ebook-esera2011_RUIZ-06.pdf, 2011, Strand 6
• Sadler, T.D., (2011) Socioscientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research., , Dordrecht: Springer
• Salmon, M.H., (1995) Introduction to logic and critical thinking., , Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace
• Samaja, J., (1999) Epistemología y metodología: Elementos para una teoría de la investigación científica, , (3rd edition). Buenos Aires: EUDEBA
• Sampson, V.D., Clark, D.B., Assessment of argument in science education: A critical review of the literature (2006) Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning of Science: Making a difference, pp. 655-661. , Barab, A., Hay, K.E. & Hickey, D.T. (Eds.), Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
• Sampson, V.D., Clark, D.B., Incorporating scientific argumentation into inquiry-based activities with online personally-seeded discussions (2007) The Science Scope, 30 (6), pp. 43-47
• Sampson, V.D., Clark, D.B., Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions (2008) Science Education, 92 (3), pp. 447-472
• Sandoval, W.A., Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations (2003) Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12 (1), pp. 5-51
• Sandoval, W.A., Millwood, K.A., The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations (2005) Cognition and Instruction, 23 (1), pp. 23-55
• Sandoval, W.A., Millwood, K.A., What can argumentation tell us about epistemology (2008) Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, pp. 71-88. , Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (Eds.), Dordrecht: Springer
• Sandoval, W.A., Reiser, B., Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry (2004) Science Education, 88 (3), pp. 345-372
• Sanmartí, N., (2003) Aprendre ciències tot aprenent a escriure ciència., , Barcelona: Edicions 62
• Santibáñez, C., Teoría de la argumentación como epistemología aplicada (2012) Cinta de Moebio, 43, pp. 24-39
• Sasseron, L.H., Carvalho, A.M.P., Construindo argumentação na sala de aula: A presença do ciclo argumentativo, os indicadores de alfabetização científica e o padrão de Toulmin (2011) Ciência & Educação, 17 (1), pp. 97-114
• Schwarz, B.B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., Ilya, M., Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity: An empirical study (2003) The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12 (2), pp. 221-258
• Siegel, H., Why should educators care about argumentation (1995) Informal Logic, 17 (2), pp. 159-176
• Smith, P., (2003) An introduction to formal logic., , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Stadler, F., (2004) Induction and deduction in the sciences., , Dordrecht: Kluwer
• Sutton, C., Beliefs about science and beliefs about language (1996) International Journal of Science Education, 18 (1), pp. 1-18
• Tiberghien, A., Preface (2008) Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, , Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (Eds.), Dordrecht: Springer
• Tindale, C.W., (1999) Acts of arguing: A rhetorical model of argument., , Albany: State University of New York Press
• Toulmin, S.E., (1958) The uses of argument., , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Toulmin, S.E., (2001) Return to reason., , Cambridge: Harvard University Press
• Toulmin, S.E., (2003) The uses of argument, , (updated edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• van Eemeren, F.H., Houtlosser, P., The development of the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation (2003) Argumentation, 17, pp. 387-403
• von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J.F., Simon, S., Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge (2008) Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (1), pp. 101-131
• Walton, D.N., (1996) Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning., , Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
• Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., Riquarts, K., (2000) Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition., , Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations (2008) Science Education, 92 (5), pp. 941-967
• Wolpert, L., (1992) The unnatural nature of science: Why science does not make common sense., , London: Faber and Faber
• Zeidler, D.L., (2003) The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science educationn, , Dordrecht: Kluwer

Citas:

---------- APA ----------

---------- CHICAGO ----------

---------- MLA ----------

---------- VANCOUVER ----------