Artículo

Estamos trabajando para incorporar este artículo al repositorio
Consulte el artículo en la página del editor
Consulte la política de Acceso Abierto del editor

Abstract:

The need for functional risk assessment bodies in general, and in the biosafety field in particular, demands continued efforts and commitment from regulatory agencies, if results that are sustainable in time are to be achieved. The lack of formal processes that ensure continuity in the application of state of the art scientific criteria, the high rotation in some cases or the lack of experienced professionals, in others, is a challenge to be addressed. Capacity building initiatives with different approaches and degrees of success have been implemented in many countries over the years, supported by diverse governmental and non-governmental organizations. This document summarizes some capacity building experiences in developing countries and concludes that risk assessors taking ownership and regulatory authorities fully committed to developing and retaining highly qualified bodies are a sine qua non to achieve sustainable systems. To this end, it is essential to implement "in-house" continuing education mechanisms supported by external experts and organizations, and inter-institutional cooperation. It has to be noted that these recommendations could only be realized if policy makers understand and appreciate the value of professional, independent regulatory bodies. © 2018 Fernández Ríos, Rubinstein and Vicién.

Registro:

Documento: Artículo
Título:Capacities for the risk assessment of GMOs: Challenges to build sustainable systems
Autor:Ríos, D.F.; Rubinstein, C.; Vicién, C.
Filiación:Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Asunción, Paraguay
ILSI Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina - Monsanto Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina
School of Agriculture, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina - ILSI Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Palabras clave:Biosafety regulatory systems; Capacity building; Collective action; Problem formulation; Risk assessment; Biohazards; Developing countries; Capacity building; Collective action; Continuing education; Nongovernmental organizations; Problem formulation; Regulatory authorities; Regulatory systems; Sustainable systems; Risk assessment
Año:2018
Volumen:6
Número:APR
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00040
Título revista:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Título revista abreviado:Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
ISSN:22964185
Registro:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_22964185_v6_nAPR_p_Rios

Referencias:

  • Bartholomaeus, A., Batista, J.C., Burachik, M., Parrott, W., Recommendations from the workshop on comparative approaches to safety assessment of GM Plant materials: a road toward harmonized criteria? (2015) GM Crops Food, 6, pp. 69-79
  • Deluyker, H., Is scientific assessment a scientific discipline? (2017) EFSA J, 15
  • Garcia-Alonso, M., (2013) Safety Assessment of Food and Feed Derived from GM Crops: Using Problem Formulation to Ensure "Fit for Purpose" Risk Assessments, , Collection of Biosafety Reviews Vol. 8 International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB)
  • Garcia-Alonso, M., Raybould, A., Protection goals in environmental risk assessment: a practical approach (2014) Transgenic Res, 23, pp. 945-956
  • (2015) The Partnership for Biosafety Risk Assessment and Regulation, , http://ilsirf.org/publication/pbrar_summary, Project Summary
  • (2017) E-learning Courses, , http://ilsirf.org/resources/e-learning-courses/
  • Klimisch, H.-J., Andreae, M., Tillmann, U., A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data (1997) Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol, 25, pp. 1-5
  • (2017) National Agricultural and Forestry Biosafety Commission, , http://www.mag.gov.py:222/index.php/legislacion
  • (2005) Introduction to the Biosafety Consensus Documents of OECD's Working Groups for Harmonisation in Biotechnology, , http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/biotrack/46815808.pdf, Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 32
  • Soerensen, C., Rubinstein, C., Oviedo, R., Levitus, G., Rojas, L., García-Alonso, M., 'Partnership for Biosafety Risk Assessment and Regulation: some reflections on the activities of the Capacity Building Support Program for Paraguay,' (2014) Poster 13th International Symposium on Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms, , (ISBGMO) (Cape Town)
  • Vicién, C., Trigo, E., 'The argentinian GMO biosafety system: an evolving perspective,' (2017) Genetically Modified Organisms in Developing Countries Risk Analysis and Governance, pp. 247-257. , eds A. A. Adenle, E. J. Morris, D. J. Murphy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press)
  • Wolt, J.D., Keese, P., Raybould, A., Fitzpatrick, J.W., Burachik, M., Gray, A., Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants (2010) Transgenic Res, 19, pp. 425-436

Citas:

---------- APA ----------
Ríos, D.F., Rubinstein, C. & Vicién, C. (2018) . Capacities for the risk assessment of GMOs: Challenges to build sustainable systems. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 6(APR).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00040
---------- CHICAGO ----------
Ríos, D.F., Rubinstein, C., Vicién, C. "Capacities for the risk assessment of GMOs: Challenges to build sustainable systems" . Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 6, no. APR (2018).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00040
---------- MLA ----------
Ríos, D.F., Rubinstein, C., Vicién, C. "Capacities for the risk assessment of GMOs: Challenges to build sustainable systems" . Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. APR, 2018.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00040
---------- VANCOUVER ----------
Ríos, D.F., Rubinstein, C., Vicién, C. Capacities for the risk assessment of GMOs: Challenges to build sustainable systems. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018;6(APR).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00040