Registro:

Referencias:

• Alonso, M.L., Molino, G., S-ntesis de informaci-on estad-stica universitaria Argentina 2014-2015 (2016) Secretar-a de Pol-ticas Universitarias, Ministerio de Educaci-on de la Naci-on, Argentina, pp. 1-27
• Estado y Perspectivas de la Transformaci-on Digital en las Empresas Argentinas (2016) C-amara de la Industria Argentina Del Software, , Observatorio Permanente de la Industria del Software y Servicios Inform-aticos
• Carter, L., Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science (2006) ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38 (1), pp. 27-31
• Grover, S., Pea, R., Cooper, S., Remedying misperceptions of computer science among middle school students (2014) Proc. 45th ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ, pp. 343-348
• Wilson, C., Sudol, L.A., Stephenson, C., Stehlik, M., Running on empty: The failure to teach K-12 computer science in the digital age. Association for computing machinery (2010) Comput. Sci. Teachers Assoc, , New York, NY
• Furber, S., Shut down or restart the way forward for computing in UK schools (2012) Roy. Soc, , London, U.K., Tech. Rep. DES2448
• Bell, T., Andreae, P., Lambert, L., Computer science in New Zealand high schools (2010) Proc. 12th Australasian Conf. Comput. Educ, pp. 15-22
• Zur Bargury, I., A new curriculum for junior-high in computer science (2012) Proc. 17th ACM Annu. Conf. Innovation Technol. Comput. Sci. Educ, pp. 204-208
• Computer Science for All Iniative, , https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all, Accessed on: Sep. 24 2016
• Bell, T., Establishing a nationwide CS curriculum in New Zealand high schools (2014) Commun. Assoc. Comput. Machinery, 57 (2), pp. 28-30
• Cooper, S., Dann, W., Pausch, R., Teaching objects-first in introductory computer science (2003) Proc. 34th SIGCSE Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ, pp. 191-195
• Dann, W., Cooper, S., Slater, D., Alice 3.1 (abstract only) (2013) Proc. 44th ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ, p. 757
• Bonder, G., Youth, gender & ICT: Imaginaries in the construction of information society in Latin america (2008) Arbor, 184 (733), pp. 917-934
• Espinosa, R.S.C., Medina, I.G., Gonzalez, Z., Consumption of digital media by children and pre-teenagers in Catalonia, Spain (2015) Zer: Revista de Estudios de Comunicacion, 20 (39), pp. 145-162
• Newmann, F., (1992) Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools, , New York, NY, USA: Teachers College Press
• Wilson, C., Hour of code: We can solve the diversity problem in computer science (2014) ACMInroads, 5 (4), p. 22. , Dec
• Bell, T., Curzon, P., Cutts, Q., Dagiene, V., Haberman, B., Introducing students to computer science with programmes that don't emphasise programming (2011) Proc. 16th ACM Annu. Joint Conf. Innovation Technol. Comput. Sci. Edu, p. 391
• Doran, K., Boyce, A., Finkelstein, S., Barnes, T., Outreach for improved student performance: A game design and development curriculum (2012) Proc. 17th ACM Annu. Conf. Innovation Technol. Comput. Sci. Educ, pp. 209-214
• Resnick, M., Scratch: Programming for all (2009) Commun. ACM, 52 (11), pp. 60-67. , Nov
• Kerly, A., Hall, P., Bull, S., Bringing chatbots into education: Towards natural language negotiation of open learner models (2007) Knowl. Based Syst, 20 (2), pp. 177-185. , Mar
• Latham, A., Crockett, K., McLean, D., Edmonds, B., (2011) Oscar: An Intelligent Adaptive Conversational Agent Tutoring System, pp. 563-572. , Berlin, Germany: Springer
• Graesser, A.C., Chipman, P., Haynes, B.C., Olney, A., AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue (2005) IEEE Trans. Educ, 48 (4), pp. 612-618. , Nov
• Shaw, A., Using chatbots to teach socially intelligent computing principles in introductory computer science courses (2012) Proc. IEEE 9th Int. Conf. Inf. Technol, pp. 850-851
• Keegan, M., Boyle, R.D., Dee, H.M., Turi: Chatbot software for schools in the turing centenary (2012) Proc. 7th Workshop Primary Secondary Comput. Educ, pp. 153-154
• Bigham, J.P., Aller, M.B., Brudvik, J.T., Leung, J.O., Yazzolino, L.A., Ladner, R.E., Inspiring blind high school students to pursue computer science with instant messaging chatbots (2008) Proc. 39th SIGCSE Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ, pp. 449-453
• Margolis, J., Fisher, A., (2003) Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing, , Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press
• Gross, E.F., Adolescent internet use: What we expect, what teens report (2004) J. Appl. Develop. Psychology, 25 (6), pp. 633-649
• Voyles, M.M., Haller, S.M., Fossum, T.V., Teacher responses to student gender differences (2007) Proc. 12th Annu. SIGCSE Conf. Innovation Technol. Comput. Sci. Educ, pp. 226-230
• Black, J., Brodie, J., Curzon, P., Myketiak, C., McOwan, P.W., Meagher, L.R., Making computing interesting to school students: Teachers' perspectives (2013) Proc. 18th ACM Conf. Innovation Technol. Comput. Sci. Educ, pp. 255-260
• Lemaire, M., Incorporating computer science into an elementary school curriculum (2014) Student Projects, Computer Science Undergraduate Society, McGill University
• Wille, S.J., Kim, D., Factors affecting high school student engagement in introductory computer science classes (abstract only) (2015) Proc. 46th ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ, p. 675
• Papastergiou, M., Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation (2009) Comput. Educ, 52 (1), pp. 1-12. , Jan
• Carolyn Yang, Y.-T., Chang, C.-H., Empowering students through digital game authorship: Enhancing concentration, critical thinking, and academic achievement (2013) Comput. Edu, (68), pp. 334-344. , Oct
• Murphy, L., Richards, B., McCauley, R., Morrison, B.B., Westbrook, S., Fossum, T., Women catch up: Gender differences in learning programming concepts (2006) ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38 (1), pp. 17-21
• Barron, B., Learning ecologies for technological fluency: Gender and experience differences (2004) J. Educational Comput. Res, 31 (1), pp. 1-36
• Pattis, R.E., (1981) Karel the Robot: A Gentle Introduction to the Art of Programming, , 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley
• Harvey, B., (1985) Computer Science LOGOStyle No. I: Intermediate Programming, , Cambridge,MA, USA: Massachusetts Inst. Technol
• Utting, I., Cooper, S., Kolling, M., Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Alice, greenfoot, and scratch-a discussion (2010) Trans. Comput. Educ, 10 (4), pp. 171-1711. , Nov
• Kolling, M., The greenfoot programming environment (2010) ACM Trans. Comput. Educ, 10 (4), pp. 141-1421. , Nov
• Dann, W., Cosgrove, D., Slater, D., Culyba, D., Cooper, S., Mediated transfer: Alice 3 to Java (2012) Proc. 43rd ACM Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci. Educ, pp. 141-146
• Brusilovsky, P., Calabrese, E., Hvorecky, J., Kouchnirenko, A., Miller, P., Mini-languages: A way to learn programming principles (1998) Educ. Inf. Technol, 2 (1), pp. 65-83. , Jan
• Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers (2005) ACM Comput. Surveys, 37 (2), pp. 83-137. , Jun
• Brusilovsky, P., Increasing adoption of smart learning content for computer science education (2014) Proc. Working Group Rep. Innovation Technol. Comput. Sci. Educ. Conf, pp. 31-57
• Hartmann, W., Nievergelt, J., Reichert, R., Kara, finite state machines, and the case for programming as part of general education (2001) Proc. IEEE Symposia Human Centric Comput. Languages Environ, pp. 135-141
• Seals, C., Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M., Lewis, T., Colson, L., Fun learning Stagecast Creator: An exercise in minimalism and collaboration (2002) Proc. IEEE Symposia Human Centric Comput. Languages Environ, pp. 177-191
• Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., Chen, Z., Retention and intention in massive open online courses: In depth (2013) Educause Rev., Louisville, CO, USA, Tech. Re, , 3613
• Wiliam, D., Five" key strategies" for effective formative assessment (2007) The Nat. Council Teachers Math, , Reston, VA, USA
• Shute, V.J., Focus on formative feedback (2008) Rev. Educational Res, (78), pp. 153-189
• Black, P., Wiliam, D., Developing the theory of formative assessment (2009) Educational Assessment Eval. Accountability, 21 (1), pp. 5-31
• Wiliam, D., What is assessment for learning (2011) Studies Educational Eval, 37 (1), pp. 3-14
• Butler, R., Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance (1987) J. Educational Psychology, 79 (4), pp. 474-482
• Padr, L., Stanilovsky, E., Freeling 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality (2012) The Language Resources Eval. Conf, , Istanbul, Turkey, May
• Pears, A., A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming (2007) ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39 (4), pp. 204-223
• Prince, M.J., Felder, R.M., Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases (2006) J. Eng. Educ, 95 (2), pp. 123-138
• O'Kelly, J., Gibson, J.P., RoboCode & problem-based learning: A non-prescriptive approach to teaching programming (2006) ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38 (3), pp. 217-221
• Naps, T.L., Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education (2002) ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35 (2), pp. 131-152
• Marangunic, N., Granic, A., Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to (2013) Universal Access Inf. Soc, 14 (1), pp. 81-95. , 2015
• Creswell, J., (2013) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, , 4th ed. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage
• Berglund, A., Daniels, M., Pears, A., Qualitative research projects in computing education research: An overview (2006) Proc. 8th Australasian Conf. Comput. Educ, pp. 25-33

Citas:

---------- APA ----------

---------- CHICAGO ----------

---------- MLA ----------

---------- VANCOUVER ----------