Registro:

Referencias:

• Jorgensen, W.L., The many roles of computation in drug discovery (2004) Science, 303, pp. 1813-1818
• Sliwoski, G., Kothiwale, S., Meiler, J., Lowe, E.W., Jr., Computational methods in drug discovery (2014) Pharmacol. Rev., 66, pp. 334-395
• Brown, D.G., Boström, J., Where do recent small molecule clinical development candidates come from? (2018) J. Med. Chem., 61, pp. 9442-9468
• Bottaro, S., Lindorff-Larsen, K., Biophysical experiments and biomolecular simulations: A perfect match? (2018) Science, 361, pp. 355-360
• Lazaridis, T., Inhomogeneous fluid approach to solvation thermodynamics. 1. Theory (1998) J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, pp. 3531-3541
• Pan, A.C., Xu, H., Palpant, T., Shaw, D.E., Quantitative characterization of the binding and unbinding of millimolar drug fragments with molecular dynamics simulations (2017) J. Chem. Theory Comput., 13, pp. 3372-3377
• Lee, E.H., Hsin, J., Sotomayor, M., Comellas, G., Schulten, K., Discovery through the computational microscope (2009) Structure, 17, pp. 1295-1306
• Goodford, P.J., A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules (1985) J. Med. Chem., 28, pp. 849-857
• Miranker, A., Karplus, M., Functionality maps of binding sites: A multiple copy simultaneous search method (1991) Proteins, 11, pp. 29-34
• Brenke, R., Kozakov, D., Chuang, G.-Y., Beglov, D., Hall, D., Landon, M.R., Mattos, C., Vajda, S., Fragment-based identification of druggable “hot spots” of proteins using Fourier domain correlation techniques (2009) Bioinformatics, 25, pp. 621-627
• Baum, B., Muley, L., Smolinski, M., Heine, A., Hangauer, D., Klebe, G., Non-additivity of functional group contributions in protein-ligand binding: A comprehensive study by crystallography and isothermal titration calorimetry (2010) J. Mol. Biol., 397, pp. 1042-1054
• Biela, A., Betz, M., Heine, A., Klebe, G., Water makes the difference: Rearrangement of Water Solvation Layer Triggers Non-additivity of Functional Group Contributions in Protein–Ligand Binding (2012) ChemMedChem, 7, pp. 1423-1434
• Eastman, P., Swails, J., Chodera, J.D., McGibbon, R.T., Zhao, Y., Beauchamp, K.A., Wang, L.-P., Stern, C.D., OpenMM 7: Rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics (2017) PLoS Comput. Biol., 13
• Kutzner, C., Páll, S., Fechner, M., Esztermann, A., de Groot, B.L., Grubmüller, H., Best bang for your buck: GPU nodes for GROMACS biomolecular simulations (2015) J. Comput. Chem., 36, pp. 1990-2008
• Lee, T.-S., Cerutti, D.S., Mermelstein, D., Lin, C., LeGrand, S., Giese, T.J., Roitberg, A., York, D.M., GPU-accelerated molecular dynamics and free energy methods in AMBER18: Performance enhancements and new features (2018) J. Chem. Inf. Model.
• Li, Z., Lazaridis, T., The effect of water displacement on binding thermodynamics: Concanavalin A (2005) J. Phys. Chem. B, 109, pp. 662-670
• Englert, L., Biela, A., Zayed, M., Heine, A., Hangauer, D., Klebe, G., Displacement of disordered water molecules from hydrophobic pocket creates enthalpic signature: Binding of phosphonamidate to the S1 0 -pocket of thermolysin (2010) BBA—Gen. Subj., 1800, pp. 1192-1202
• Michel, J., Tirado-Rives, J., Jorgensen, W.L., Energetics of displacing water molecules from protein binding sites: Consequences for ligand optimization (2009) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, pp. 15403-15411
• García-Sosa, A.T., Mancera, R.L., Dean, P.M., Waterscore: A novel method for distinguishing between bound and displaceable water molecules in the crystal structure of the binding site of protein-ligand complexes (2003) J. Mol. Model., 9, pp. 172-182
• Crawford, T.D., Tsui, V., Flynn, E.M., Wang, S., Taylor, A.M., Côté, A., Audia, J.E., Cummings, R., Diving into the water: Inducible binding conformations for BRD4, TAF1(2), BRD9, and CECR2 bromodomains (2016) J. Med. Chem., 59, pp. 5391-5402
• Ladbury, J.E., Just add water! The effect of water on the specificity of protein-ligand binding sites and its potential application to drug design (1996) Chem. Biol., 3, pp. 973-980
• Poornima, C.S., Dean, P.M., Hydration in drug design. 1. Multiple hydrogen-bonding features of water molecules in mediating protein-ligand interactions (1995) J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 9, pp. 500-512
• Levinson, N.M., Boxer, S.G., A conserved water-mediated hydrogen bond network defines bosutinib’s kinase selectivity (2014) Nat. Chem. Biol., 10, pp. 127-132
• García-Sosa, A.T., Hydration properties of ligands and drugs in protein binding sites: Tightly-bound, bridging water molecules and their effects and consequences on molecular design strategies (2013) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 53, pp. 1388-1405
• Sridhar, A., Ross, G.A., Biggin, P.C., WaterDock 2.0: Water placement prediction for Holo-structures with a pymol plugin (2017) PLoS ONE, 12
• Bissantz, C., Kuhn, B., Stahl, M., A medicinal chemist’s guide to molecular interactions (2010) J. Med. Chem., 53, pp. 5061-5084
• Wiesner, S., Kurian, E., Prendergast, F.G., Halle, B., Water molecules in the binding cavity of intestinal fatty acid binding protein: Dynamic characterization by water 17O and 2H magnetic relaxation dispersion (1999) J. Mol. Biol., 286, pp. 233-246
• Gauto, D.F., Di Lella, S., Guardia, C.M.A., Estrin, D.A., Martí, M.A., Carbohydrate-binding proteins: Dissecting ligand structures through solvent environment occupancy (2009) J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, pp. 8717-8724
• López, E.D., Arcon, J.P., Gauto, D.F., Petruk, A.A., Modenutti, C.P., Dumas, V.G., Marti, M.A., Turjanski, A.G., Watclust: A tool for improving the design of drugs based on protein-water interactions (2015) Bioinformatics, 31, pp. 3697-3699
• Klibanov, A.M., Improving enzymes by using them in organic solvents (2001) Nature, 409, pp. 241-246
• Halling, P.J., What can we learn by studying enzymes in non-aqueous media? (2004) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 359, pp. 1287-1296
• Allen, K.N., Bellamacina, C.R., Ding, X., Jeffery, C.J., Mattos, C., Petsko, G.A., Ringe, D., An experimental approach to mapping the binding surfaces of crystalline proteins (1996) J. Phys. Chem., 100, pp. 2605-2611
• Liepinsh, E., Otting, G., Organic solvents identify specific ligand binding sites on protein surfaces (1997) Nat. Biotechnol., 15, pp. 264-268
• English, A.C., Done, S.H., Caves, L.S., Groom, C.R., Hubbard, R.E., Locating interaction sites on proteins: The crystal structure of thermolysin soaked in 2% to 100% isopropanol (1999) Proteins, 37, pp. 628-640
• English, A.C., Groom, C.R., Hubbard, R.E., Experimental and computational mapping of the binding surface of a crystalline protein (2001) Protein Eng, 14, pp. 47-59
• Clackson, T., Wells, J.A., A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface (1995) Science, 267, pp. 383-386
• Caflisch, A., Computational combinatorial ligand design: Application to human alpha-thrombin (1996) J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 10, pp. 372-396
• Seco, J., Luque, F.J., Barril, X., Binding site detection and druggability index from first principles (2009) J. Med. Chem., 52, pp. 2363-2371
• Vukovic, S., Huggins, D.J., Quantitative metrics for drug-target ligandability (2018) Drug Discov. Today, 23, pp. 1258-1266
• Barril, X., Druggability predictions: Methods, limitations, and applications (2013) Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci., 3, pp. 327-338
• Guvench, O., MacKerell, A.D., Jr., Computational fragment-based binding site identification by ligand competitive saturation (2009) PLoS Comput. Biol., 5
• Bakan, A., Nevins, N., Lakdawala, A.S., Bahar, I., Druggability assessment of allosteric proteins by dynamics simulations in the presence of probe molecules (2012) J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8, pp. 2435-2447
• Ghanakota, P., Carlson, H.A., Moving beyond active-site detection: MixMD applied to allosteric systems (2016) J. Phys. Chem. B, 120, pp. 8685-8695
• Sayyed-Ahmad, A., Gorfe, A.A., Mixed-probe simulation and probe-derived surface topography map analysis for ligand binding site identification (2017) J. Chem. Theory Comput., 13, pp. 1851-1861
• Yu, W., Lakkaraju, S.K., Raman, E.P., Fang, L., MacKerell, A.D., Jr., Pharmacophore modeling using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) with multiple probe molecules (2015) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 55, pp. 407-420
• Ghanakota, P., van Vlijmen, H., Sherman, W., Beuming, T., Large-scale validation of mixed-solvent simulations to assess hotspots at protein-protein interaction interfaces (2018) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 58, pp. 784-793
• Alvarez-Garcia, D., Barril, X., Molecular simulations with solvent competition quantify water displaceability and provide accurate interaction maps of protein binding sites (2014) J. Med. Chem., 57, pp. 8530-8539
• Graham, S.E., Smith, R.D., Carlson, H.A., Predicting displaceable water sites using mixed-solvent molecular dynamics (2018) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 58, pp. 305-314
• Uehara, S., Tanaka, S., Cosolvent-based molecular dynamics for ensemble docking: Practical method for generating druggable protein conformations (2017) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 57, pp. 742-756
• Oleinikovas, V., Saladino, G., Cossins, B.P., Gervasio, F.L., Understanding cryptic pocket formation in protein targets by enhanced sampling simulations (2016) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 138, pp. 14257-14263
• Comitani, F., Gervasio, F.L., Exploring cryptic pockets formation in targets of pharmaceutical interest with swiSH (2018) J. Chem. Theory Comput., 14, pp. 3321-3331
• Kimura, S.R., Hu, H.P., Ruvinsky, A.M., Sherman, W., Favia, A.D., Deciphering cryptic binding sites on proteins by mixed-solvent molecular dynamics (2017) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 57, pp. 1388-1401
• Raman, E.P., Yu, W., Guvench, O., Mackerell, A.D., Reproducing crystal binding modes of ligand functional groups using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations (2011) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 51, pp. 877-896
• Arcon, J.P., Defelipe, L.A., Modenutti, C.P., López, E.D., Alvarez-Garcia, D., Barril, X., Turjanski, A.G., Martí, M.A., Molecular dynamics in mixed solvents reveals protein-ligand interactions, improves docking, and allows accurate binding free energy predictions (2017) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 57, pp. 846-863
• Ghanakota, P., Carlson, H.A., Driving structure-based drug discovery through cosolvent molecular dynamics (2016) J. Med. Chem., 59, pp. 10383-10399
• Pan, A.C., Borhani, D.W., Dror, R.O., Shaw, D.E., Molecular determinants of drug-receptor binding kinetics (2013) Drug Discov. Today, 18, pp. 667-673
• Kuntz, I.D., Chen, K., Sharp, K.A., Kollman, P.A., The maximal affinity of ligands (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, pp. 9997-10002
• Huang, D., Caflisch, A., The free energy landscape of small molecule unbinding (2011) PLoS Comput. Biol., 7
• Lexa, K.W., Goh, G.B., Carlson, H.A., Parameter choice matters: Validating probe parameters for use in mixed-solvent simulations (2014) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 54, pp. 2190-2199
• Foster, T.J., MacKerell, A.D., Jr., Guvench, O., Balancing target flexibility and target denaturation in computational fragment-based inhibitor discovery (2012) J. Comput. Chem., 33, pp. 1880-1891
• Alvarez-Garcia, D., Barril, X., Relationship between protein flexibility and binding: Lessons for structure-based drug design (2014) J. Chem. Theory Comput., 10, pp. 2608-2614
• Erlanson, D.A., Fesik, S.W., Hubbard, R.E., Jahnke, W., Jhoti, H., Twenty years on: The impact of fragments on drug discovery (2016) Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 15, pp. 605-619
• Chen, Y., Shoichet, B.K., Molecular docking and ligand specificity in fragment-based inhibitor discovery (2009) Nat. Chem. Biol., 5, pp. 358-364
• Giannetti, A.M., Shoichet, B.K., Docking for fragment inhibitors of AmpC β-lactamase (2009) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, pp. 7455-7460
• Zhao, H., Gartenmann, L., Dong, J., Spiliotopoulos, D., Caflisch, A., Discovery of BRD4 bromodomain inhibitors by fragment-based high-throughput docking (2014) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 24, pp. 2493-2496
• Spiliotopoulos, D., Zhu, J., Wamhoff, E.-C., Deerain, N., Marchand, J.-R., Aretz, J., Rademacher, C., Caflisch, A., Virtual screen to NMR (VS2NMR): Discovery of fragment hits for the CBP bromodomain (2017) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 27, pp. 2472-2478
• Vass, M., Agai-Csongor, E., Horti, F., Keseru, G.M., Multiple fragment docking and linking in primary and secondary pockets of dopamine receptors (2014) ACS Med. Chem. Lett., 5, pp. 1010-1014
• Marchand, J.-R., Dalle Vedove, A., Lolli, G., Caflisch, A., Discovery of inhibitors of four bromodomains by fragment-anchored ligand docking (2017) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 57, pp. 2584-2597
• Jubb, H., Blundell, T.L., Ascher, D.B., Flexibility and small pockets at protein-protein interfaces: New insights into druggability (2015) Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 119, pp. 2-9
• Chipot, C., Pohorille, A., (2007) Free Energy Calculations: Theory and Applications in Chemistry and Biology, , Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, ISBN
• Chen, D., Ranganathan, A., IJzerman, A.P., Siegal, G., Carlsson, J., Complementarity between in silico and biophysical screening approaches in fragment-based lead discovery against the A(2A) adenosine receptor (2013) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 53, pp. 2701-2714
• Steinbrecher, T.B., Dahlgren, M., Cappel, D., Lin, T., Wang, L., Krilov, G., Abel, R., Sherman, W., Accurate binding free energy predictions in fragment optimization (2015) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 55, pp. 2411-2420
• Jiang, W., Roux, B., Free energy perturbation Hamiltonian replica-exchange molecular dynamics (FEP/H-REMD) for absolute ligand binding free energy calculations (2010) J. Chem. Theory Comput., 6, pp. 2559-2565
• Aldeghi, M., Heifetz, A., Bodkin, M.J., Knapp, S., Biggin, P.C., Accurate calculation of the absolute free energy of binding for drug molecules (2016) Chem. Sci., 7, pp. 207-218
• Lin, Y.-L., Meng, Y., Jiang, W., Roux, B., Explaining why Gleevec is a specific and potent inhibitor of Abl kinase (2013) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, pp. 1664-1669
• Dror, R.O., Pan, A.C., Arlow, D.H., Borhani, D.W., Maragakis, P., Shan, Y., Xu, H., Shaw, D.E., Pathway and mechanism of drug binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (2011) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, pp. 13118-13123
• Mondal, J., Friesner, R.A., Berne, B.J., Role of desolvation in thermodynamics and kinetics of ligand binding to a kinase (2014) J. Chem. Theory Comput., 10, pp. 5696-5705
• Tiwary, P., Mondal, J., Berne, B.J., How and when does an anticancer drug leave its binding site? (2017) Sci. Adv., 3, p. e1700014
• Lotz, S.D., Dickson, A., Unbiased molecular dynamics of 11 min timescale drug unbinding reveals transition state stabilizing interactions (2018) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 140, pp. 618-628
• Plattner, N., Noé, F., Protein conformational plasticity and complex ligand-binding kinetics explored by atomistic simulations and Markov models (2015) Nat. Commun., 6, p. 7653
• Bisignano, P., Doerr, S., Harvey, M.J., Favia, A.D., Cavalli, A., De Fabritiis, G., Kinetic characterization of fragment binding in AmpC β-lactamase by high-throughput molecular simulations (2014) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 54, pp. 362-366
• Ferruz, N., Harvey, M.J., Mestres, J., De Fabritiis, G., Insights from fragment hit binding assays by molecular simulations (2015) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 55, pp. 2200-2205
• Buch, I., Giorgino, T., De Fabritiis, G., Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations (2011) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, pp. 10184-10189
• Rathi, P.C., Ludlow, R.F., Hall, R.J., Murray, C.W., Mortenson, P.N., Verdonk, M.L., Predicting “hot” and “warm” spots for fragment binding (2017) J. Med. Chem., 60, pp. 4036-4046
• Martinez-Rosell, G., Harvey, M.J., De Fabritiis, G., Molecular-simulation-driven fragment screening for the discovery of new CXCL12 inhibitors (2018) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 58, pp. 683-691
• Ludlow, R.F., Verdonk, M.L., Saini, H.K., Tickle, I.J., Jhoti, H., Detection of secondary binding sites in proteins using fragment screening (2015) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, pp. 15910-15915
• Shan, Y., Kim, E.T., Eastwood, M.P., Dror, R.O., Seeliger, M.A., Shaw, D.E., How does a drug molecule find its target binding site? (2011) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133, pp. 9181-9183
• Colizzi, F., Perozzo, R., Scapozza, L., Recanatini, M., Cavalli, A., Single-molecule pulling simulations can discern active from inactive enzyme inhibitors (2010) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, pp. 7361-7371
• Gioia, D., Bertazzo, M., Recanatini, M., Masetti, M., Cavalli, A., Dynamic docking: A paradigm shift in computational drug discovery (2017) Molecules, 22, p. 2029
• Casasnovas, R., Limongelli, V., Tiwary, P., Carloni, P., Parrinello, M., Unbinding kinetics of a p38 MAP kinase type II inhibitor from metadynamics simulations (2017) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 139, pp. 4780-4788
• Ruiz-Carmona, S., Schmidtke, P., Luque, F.J., Baker, L., Matassova, N., Davis, B., Roughley, S., Barril, X., Dynamic undocking and the quasi-bound state as tools for drug discovery (2017) Nat. Chem., 9, pp. 201-206
• Morris, G.M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M.F., Belew, R.K., Goodsell, D.S., Olson, A.J., Autodock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility (2009) J. Comput. Chem., 30, pp. 2785-2791
• Forli, S., Huey, R., Pique, M.E., Sanner, M.F., Goodsell, D.S., Olson, A.J., Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite (2016) Nat. Protoc., 11, pp. 905-919
• Ruiz-Carmona, S., Alvarez-Garcia, D., Foloppe, N., Garmendia-Doval, A.B., Juhos, S., Schmidtke, P., Barril, X., Morley, S.D., RDock: A fast, versatile and open source program for docking ligands to proteins and nucleic acids (2014) PLoS Comput. Biol., 10
• Sousa, S.F., Ribeiro, A.J.M., Coimbra, J.T.S., Neves, R.P.P., Martins, S.A., Moorthy, N.S., Fernandes, P.A., Ramos, M.J., Protein-ligand docking in the new millennium—a retrospective of 10 years in the field (2013) Curr. Med. Chem., 20, pp. 2296-2314
• Cleves, A.E., Jain, A.N., Knowledge-guided docking: Accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock (2015) J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 29, pp. 485-509
• Hu, B., Lill, M.A., PharmDock: A pharmacophore-based docking program (2014) J. Cheminform., 6, p. 14
• Perryman, A.L., Santiago, D.N., Forli, S., Martins, D.S., Olson, A.J., Virtual screening with AutoDock Vina and the common pharmacophore engine of a low diversity library of fragments and hits against the three allosteric sites of HIV integrase: Participation in the SAMPL4 protein-ligand binding challenge (2014) J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 28, pp. 429-441
• Friesner, R.A., Banks, J.L., Murphy, R.B., Halgren, T.A., Klicic, J.J., Mainz, D.T., Repasky, M.P., Perry, J.K., Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy (2004) J. Med. Chem., 47, pp. 1739-1749
• Jones, G., Willett, P., Glen, R.C., Leach, A.R., Taylor, R., Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking (1997) J. Mol. Biol., 267, pp. 727-748
• Corbeil, C.R., Williams, C.I., Labute, P., Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation (2012) J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des., 26, pp. 775-786
• Allen, W.J., Balius, T.E., Mukherjee, S., Brozell, S.R., Moustakas, D.T., Lang, P.T., Case, D.A., Rizzo, R.C., Dock 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance (2015) J. Comput. Chem., 36, pp. 1132-1156
• Coleman, R.G., Carchia, M., Sterling, T., Irwin, J.J., Shoichet, B.K., Ligand pose and orientational sampling in molecular docking (2013) PLoS ONE, 8
• Balius, T.E., Fischer, M., Stein, R.M., Adler, T.B., Nguyen, C.N., Cruz, A., Gilson, M.K., Shoichet, B.K., Testing inhomogeneous solvation theory in structure-based ligand discovery (2017) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, pp. E6839-E6846
• Uehara, S., Tanaka, S., AutoDock-GisT: Incorporating thermodynamics of active-site water into scoring function for accurate protein-ligand docking (2016) Molecules, 21, p. 1604
• Gohlke, H., Hendlich, M., Klebe, G., Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions (2000) J. Mol. Biol., 295, pp. 337-356
• Muegge, I., Martin, Y.C., A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: A simplified potential approach (1999) J. Med. Chem., 42, pp. 791-804
• Zheng, Z., Merz, K.M., Development of the knowledge-based and empirical combined scoring algorithm (KECSA) to score protein–ligand interactions (2013) J. Chem. Inf. Model., 53, pp. 1073-1083
• Wang, L., Wu, Y., Deng, Y., Kim, B., Pierce, L., Krilov, G., Lupyan, D., Greenwood, J., Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field (2015) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 137, pp. 2695-2703
• García-Sosa, A.T., Mancera, R.L., Free energy calculations of mutations involving a tightly bound water molecule and ligand substitutions in a ligand-protein complex (2010) Mol. Inform., 29, pp. 589-600
• Aldeghi, M., Ross, G.A., Bodkin, M.J., Essex, J.W., Knapp, S., Biggin, P.C., Large-scale analysis of water stability in bromodomain binding pockets with grand canonical Monte Carlo (2018) Commun. Chem., 1, p. 19

Citas:

---------- APA ----------

---------- CHICAGO ----------

---------- MLA ----------

---------- VANCOUVER ----------