Referencias:

• Guariglia, F., The rules of procedure and evidence for the international criminal court: A development in international adjudication of individual criminal responsibility (2002) The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, pp. 1111-1133. , Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta and John RWD Jones eds, Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford
• Hunt, D., The international criminal court - High hopes, 'creative ambiguity' and an unfortunate mistrust in international judges (2004) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2, p. 56. , 61-63
• Kirsch, P., The international criminal court: A new and necessary institution meriting continued international support (2005) Fordham International Law Journal, 28, p. 292. , 304-305
• Kaul, H.-P., Construction site for more justice: The international criminal court after two years (2005) American Journal of International Law, 99, p. 370. , 376
• (2005) Practice Direction on the Length of Briefs and Motions, , 16 September, IT/184/Rev. 2
• ICTR, (2002) Practice Direction on the Length of Briefs and Motions on Appeal, , 16 September
• SCSL, (2003) Practice Direction on Filing Documents Before the Special Court for Sierra Leone, , adopted on 27 February, as amended
• ICTY, (2002) Practice Direction on Formal Requirements for Appeals from Judgement, , 7 March, IT/201
• (2005) Practice Direction on Procedure for the Filing of Written Submissions in Appeal Proceedings Before the International Tribunal, , 16 September, IT/155/Rev. 3
• ICTR, (2002) Practice Direction on the Length of Briefs and Motions on Appeal, , 16 September
• (2002) Practice Direction on Procedure for the Filing of Written Submissions in Appeal Proceedings Before the Tribunal, , 16 September
• (2005) Practice Direction on Formal Requirements for Appeals from Judgement, , 4 July
• Dive, G., The registry (2001) The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, pp. 277-279. , Roy Lee et al. eds., Transnational Publishers
• De Gurmendi, S.A.F., The role of the international prosecutor (1999) The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute, pp. 175-189. , Roy S. Lee ed., Kluwer Law International
• Guariglia, F., Investigation and Prosecution, pp. 227-238. , Roy S. Lee ed., note 45
• Behrens, H.-J., Investigation, trial and appeal in the international criminal court statute (Parts V, VI, VIII) (1998) European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 6, pp. 429-441
• Friman, H., Rights of Persons Suspected Or Accused of a Crime, pp. 247-262. , Roy Lee ed., note 45
• (2003) Informal Expert Paper: Measures Available to the International Criminal Court to Reduce the Length of the Proceedings, pp. 86-93. , Office of the Prosecutor
• Stahn, C., Modification of the legal characterisation of facts in the ICC system: A portrayal of regulation 55 (2005) Criminal Law Forum, 16, pp. 1-31
• Penalties, pp. 319-343. , Roy S. Lee ed, note 45
• (1999) Prosecutor v. Simić et al, Case No. IT-95-9-PTT. Ch., Decision on the Prosecutors Motion Under Rule 73 for a Ruling Concerning the Testimony of a Witness, , 27 July
• Meron, T., Procedural evolution in the ICTY (2004) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2, pp. 520-525
• Tochilovsky, V., International criminal justice: 'Strangers in the foreign system' (2004) Criminal Law Forum, 15, pp. 319-344
• Kress, C., The procedural law of the international criminal court in outline: Anatomy of a unique compromise (2003) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1, p. 603
• Brady, H., Disclosure of Evidence, pp. 422-424. , Roy Lee et al. eds., note 45
• (2005) Prosecutor v. Orić Case No. IT-03-68-AR73.2, , A. Ch., Interlocutory Decision on Length of Defence Case, 20 July
• (1985) GA Res. 40/34, , of 29 November
• Bitti, G., Friman, H., Participation of Victims in the Proceedings, pp. 456-474. , Roy S Lee et al eds, note 45
• Haslam, E., Victim participation at the international criminal court: A triumph of hope over experience? (2003) The Permanent International Criminal Court - Legal and Policy Issues, pp. 315-334. , DominickMcGoldrick, Peter Rowe and Eric Donnelly eds., Hart Publishers: Oxford and Portland Oregon
• Milošević, (2003) Case No. IT-02-54, p. 40. , T. Ch., 4 April
• (2004) Norman et al, Case No. SCSL-04-14, p. 8. , T. Ch., 8 June, and 27
• (2005) Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Case No. ICC-01/04, , Regulation 77, which refers to functions in relation to unique investigative measures in accordance with article 56 and rule 47. An alternative, however, is the appointment of an external ad hoc counsel to protect the general interests of the defence when such measures are taken, e.g, PT Ch. I, Decision on the Prosecutor's Request for Measures under Article 56, 26 April
• ICTY, (2004) Directive on Assignment of Defence Counsel, , 28 July, IT/73/Rev. 10
• (2005) Rules Governing the Detention of Persons Awaiting Trial Or Appeal Before the Tribunal Or Otherwise Detained on the Authority of the Tribunal, , 21 July, IT/38/Rev. 9
• ICTR, (2004) Directive on the Assignment of Defence Counsel, , 15 May
• (1998) Rules Covering the Detention of Persons Awaiting Trial Or Appeal Before the Tribunal Or Otherwise Detained on the Authority of the Tribunal, , 5 June

Citas:

---------- APA ----------

---------- CHICAGO ----------

---------- MLA ----------

---------- VANCOUVER ----------