Registro:

Referencias:

• (2002) Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation, , edited by D. D. Awschalom, D. Loss, and N. Samarth (Springer, Berlin
• Zutic, I., Fabian, J., Das Sarma, S., (2004) Rev. Mod. Phys., 76, p. 323. , RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.323
• Rashba, E.I., (1960) Sov. Phys. Solid State, 2, p. 1109. , 0021-3640;
• Bychkov, Y.A., Rashba, E.I., (1984) JETP Lett., 39, p. 78. , JTPLA2 0021-3640
• Bychkov, Y.A., Rashba, E.I., (1984) J. Phys. C, 17, p. 6039. , JPSOAW 0022-3719 10.1088/0022-3719/17/33/015
• Winkler, R., (2003) Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems, , Springer, Berlin
• Ceperley, D., (1978) Phys. Rev. B, 18, p. 3126. , PLRBAQ 0556-2805 10.1103/PhysRevB.18.3126
• Ortiz, G., Harris, M., Ballone, P., (1999) Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, p. 5317. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.5317
• Attaccalite, C., Moroni, S., Gori-Giorgi, P., Bachelet, G.B., (2002) Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, p. 256601. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.256601
• Gross, E.K.U., Runge, E., Heinonen, O., (1991) Many-Particle Theory, , Hilger, Bristol
• Chesi, S., Simion, G., Giuliani, G.F., arXiv:cond-mat/0702060 (unpublished); Rashba, E.I., (2003) Phys. Rev. B, 68, p. 241315. , PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.241315
• Ia. Pomeranchuk, I., (1958) Sov. Phys. JETP, 35, p. 524. , 0038-5646
• Quintanilla, J., Hooley, C., Powell, B.J., Schofield, A.J., Haque, M., (2008) Physica B, 403, p. 1279. , PHYBE3 0921-4526 10.1016/j.physb.2007.10.126
• Quintanilla, J., Schofield, A.J., (2006) Phys. Rev. B, 74, p. 115126. , PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.115126
• Quintanilla, J., ; More precisely, the circular symmetry of the dispersion relation requires that (k) = 0 (k) +nφ, where n is an integer and 0 (k) is an arbitrary function. However, Eq. 10 determines that n=1 and analyzing the expression for the HF ground-state energy (not shown), we realize that it is a minimum when 0 (k) = 0 =const. Finally, Eq. 10 forces 0 =±π/2, and as in the single-particle Rashba problem, we choose N- as the majority number, i.e., 0 =-π/2; Radtke, R.J., Tamborenea, P.I., Das Sarma, S., (1996) Phys. Rev. B, 54, p. 13832. , PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.13832
• Rajagopal, A.K., Kimball, J.C., (1977) Phys. Rev. B, 15, p. 2819. , PLRBAQ 0556-2805 10.1103/PhysRevB.15.2819
• The rs dependence of xc may be summarized as follows: (i) in the OP phase xc =0 because only the lower branch is occupied, (ii) in the IP phase at high density, on the contrary, for given p, xc decreases monotonically as rs increases due to the occupancy of both branches, and (iii) xc increases monotonically in the IP phase at low density since only the lower branch is occupied and kmin → kmax when rs increases; Ghosh, A., Ford, C.J.B., Pepper, M., Beere, H.E., Ritchie, D.A., (2004) Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, p. 116601. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.116601
• Dharma-Wardana, M.W.C., Perrot, F., (2003) Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, p. 136601. , PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.136601
• Thus, localization at low density anticipates and masks the OP-IP transition seen in Fig. 1. Note from Fig. 2 that ζ≈0.2 corresponds to p≈1 and with this value we get, from Fig. 1, a window of densities Δ rs ≈2; Juri, L.O., Tamborenea, P.I., (2005) Eur. Phys. J. B, 45, p. 9. , EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1140/epjb/e2005-00159-6

Citas:

---------- APA ----------

---------- CHICAGO ----------

---------- MLA ----------

---------- VANCOUVER ----------