Registro:

Referencias:

• Lombardi, O., La teoria del caos y el problema del determinismo (1998) Dialogos, 33 (72), pp. 21-42
• Piskunov, N., (1994) Cálcula Diferencial e Integral, , Limusa, México
• Bishop, R., On separating predictability and determinism (2003) Erkenntnis, 58 (2), pp. 169-188
• Bunge, M., (1977) Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 3: Ontology I, p. 173. , Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Boston
• Montague, R., Deterministic theories (1974) Formal Philosophy, pp. 303-359. , R. THOMASON (ed.) Yale University Press, New Haven
• Earman, J., Laplacian determinism, or is this any way to run a universe? (1971) The Journal of Philosophy, 68 (21), pp. 729-744
• Earman, J., (1986) A Primer on Determinism, pp. 20-21. , Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht
• Lewis, D., Causation (1973) Journal of Philosoph, 70 (17), pp. 556-567. , 557
• James, W., The dilemma of determinism (1897) The Will to Believe, p. 150. , Dover Publications, New York
• Da Costa, N., Krause, D., Bueno, O., Paraconsistent logics and paraconsist-ency (2007) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Logic, pp. 791-911. , D. JACQUETTE (ed.) Elsevier, Amsterdam
• Landsberg, P., La búsqueda de la certeza en un universo probabilistico (1992) Proceso Al Azar, p. 80. , J. WAGENS-BERG (ed.) Tusquets, Buenos Aires
• Kneale, W., Kneale, M., (1962) The Development of Logic, p. 117. , Clarendon Press, Oxford
• Quine, W.V.O., On what there is (1953) From a Logical Point of View, pp. 1-19. , Harper, Nueva York
• Dubois, D., Prade, H., (1988) Possibility Theory, , Plenum Press, New York
• Dubois, D., Prade, H., Possibility theory, probability theory and multiple-valued logics: A clarification (2001) Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 32 (1-4), pp. 35-66. , 35
• Kolmogorov, A.N., (1933) Foundations of the Theory of Probability, , Chelsea, New York
• Hacking, I., (1975) The Emergence of Probability, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Popper, K., The propensity interpretation of the calculus of probabilities and the quantum theory (1957) Observation and Interpretation in the Philosophy of Physics, pp. 65-70. , S. KaÖRNER (ed.) Butterworth, Londres
• Popper, K., The propensity interpretation of probability (1959) The British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 10 (37), pp. 25-42
• Suárez, M., Quantum selections, propensities and the problem of measurement (2004) The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55 (2), pp. 219-255
• Lombardi, O., Castagnino, M., A modal-hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics (2008) Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39 (2), pp. 380-443
• Huphreys, P., Why propensities cannot be probabilities (1985) The Philosophical Review, 94 (4), pp. 557-570
• Miller, D., Propensities may satisfy bayes's theorem (2002) Bayes's Theorem, Proceedings of the British Academy, 113, pp. 111-116. , R. SWINBURNE (ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Pres
• Belnap, N., Propensities and probabilities (2007) Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38 (2), pp. 593-625
• Giere, R.N., A laplacian formal semantics for single-case propensities (1976) Journal of Philosophical Logic, 5 (3), pp. 321-353
• Tolman, R., (1938) The Principles of Statistical Mechanics, pp. 68-69. , Clarendon Press, Oxford
• Earman, J., Rédei, M., Why ergodic theory does not explain the success of equilibrium statistical mechanics (1996) The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47 (1), pp. 63-78
• Lombardi, O., Es la mecânica clâsica una teoría determinista? (2002) Theoria, 17 (43), pp. 5-34
• Van Fraassen, B.C., A formal approach to the philosophy of science (1972) Paradigms and Paradoxes: The Philosophical Challenge of the Quantum Domain, pp. 303-366. , R. COLODNY (ed.) University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
• Van Fraassen, B.C., The einstein-podolsky-rosen paradox (1974) Synthese, 29 (1-4), pp. 291-309
• Vermaas, P., Unique transition probabilities in the modal interpretation (1996) Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 27 (2), pp. 133-159
• Cacciagaluppo, G., Dickson, M., Dynamics for modal interpretations (1999) Foundations of Physics, 29 (8), pp. 1165-1201
• D'Espagnat, B., (1985) Une Incertaine Réalité, pp. 122-123. , Gauthier-Villars, Paris
• Popper, K., (1982) Teoría Cudntica y el Cisma en Ftsica, p. 125. , Tecnos, Madrid
• Kosso, P., (1998) Appearance and Reality, p. 114. , Oxford University Press, Oxford MA
• Sklar, L., (1993) Physics and Chance, p. 123. , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Clark, P., Determinism and probability in physics (1987) Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 61, pp. 185-210
• Lombardi, O., Determinism, internalism and objectivity (2002) Between Chance and Choice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Determinism, pp. 75-87. , H. ATMANSPACHER y R. BISHOP (eds.) Imprint-Academic, Thorverton
• Lombardi, O., Pérez Ransanz, A.R., (2012) LOS Múltiples Mundos de la Ciencia. Un Realismo Pluralista y Su Aplicación a la Filosofia de la Física, , México, UNAM-Siglo XXI
• Lombardi, O., Pérez Ransanz, A.R., Lenguaje, ontología y relaciones interteóricas: en favor de un genuino pluralismo on-tológico (2011) Revista Arbor. Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura, 187 (747), pp. 43-52
• Lombardi, O., Labarca, M., The ontological autonomy of the chemical world (2005) Foundations of Chemistry, 7 (2), pp. 125-148
• Lombardi, O., Labarca, M., The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: A response to needham (2006) Foundations of Chemistry, 8 (1), pp. 81-92
• Lombardi, O., Labarca, M., Irreversibilidady pluralismo ontolagico (2007) Scientiae Studia. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia e História Da Ciencia, 5 (2), pp. 139-167
• Labarca, M., Lombardi, O., Why orbitals do not exist? (2010) Foundations of Chemistry, 12 (2), pp. 149-157
• Córdoba, M., Lombardi, O., A kantian perspective for the philosophy of chemistry (2013) Chemistry, the Unknown Science, , Jean-Pierre LLORED (ed.) Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge en prensa
• Batterman, R., Defining chaos (1993) Philosophy of Science, 60 (1), pp. 43-66
• Smith, P., (1998) Explaining Chaos, , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Capítulo 10
• Schuster, H.G., (1984) Deterministic Chaos, p. 92. , VCH, Weinheim
• Lombardi, O., La teoria del caos y sus problemas epistemológicos (2001) Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Chile, 57, pp. 91-109
• Lebowttzy, J.L., Penrose, O., Modern ergodic theory (1973) Physics Today, 26 (2), pp. 23-29
• Lombardi, O., El problema de la ergodicidad - en mecdnica estadistica (2003) Critica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, 35 (103), pp. 3-41
• Farmer, J.D., Dimension, fractal measure and chaotic dynamics (1982) Evolution of Order and Chaos, , H. HAKEN (ed.) Springer, Heidelberg
• Mañé, R., (1987) Ergodic Theory and Differentiable Dynamics, p. 265. , Springer, Nueva York
• Davies, P., Chaos frees the universe (1990) New Scientist, 128 (1727), pp. 48-51
• Ford, J., HOW random is a coin toss? (1983) Physics Today, 36 (4), pp. 40-47. , 43
• Prigogine, I., Stengers, I., (1979) La Nueva Alianza. Metamorfosis de la Ciencia, p. 108. , Alianza Editorial, Madrid
• Wagensberg, J., Proceso Al Azar, p. 192. , cit
• Misra, B., Prigogine, I., Courbage, M., From deterministic dynamics to probabilistic descriptions (1979) Physica A, 98 (1), pp. 1-26
• Courbage, M., Prigogine, I., Intrinsic randomness and intrinsic irreversibility in classical dynamical systems (1983) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 80 (8), pp. 2412-2416
• Lombardi, O., El fin de la omnisciencia: la respuesta de Prigogine al problema de la irreversibilidad (1999) Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentes de la Ciencia, 14 (36), pp. 489-510
• Lombardi, O., El problema de la irreversibilidad: Prigogine y la transformatión del panadero (1999) Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía, 25 (1), pp. 69-86
• Lombardi, O., Caos, ergodicidad e internalimto (2002) Revista Latinoamericana de Filo-sofía, 28 (1), pp. 7-33

Citas:

---------- APA ----------

---------- CHICAGO ----------

---------- MLA ----------

---------- VANCOUVER ----------