Abstract:

Six methods for detecting domestic infestations by triatomine bugs were compared in the rural community of Amama, north-west Argentina. An average of three pairs (range, 2-5 pairs) of sensor boxes and sheets of pink typing-paper were tacked to the walls of human sleeping areas in 45 houses for 30 days and then inspected by a two-man team. Triatoma infestans bugs were collected in bedrooms by a different two-man team aided by a flushing-out agent both before and after application of sensing devices. Finally, knockdown collections of bugs after application of one insecticide fumigant canister per bedroom were also made. The proportion of houses with evidence of current domestic bug infestations that were detected by the various methods were as follows: sensor boxes (95.3%), reports of householders (88.4%), knockdown (87.8%, paper-sheets (86.0%), and flushing-out (69.8-76.7%). The detectability of infestations, irrespective of the method used, increased with the density of the bugs. At low or intermediate bug densities, individual sensor boxes were more sensitive than their matched paper-sheets, but at any bug density there were no significant differences between the pooled results for all the boxes and for all the paper-sheets in the house. On average, each sensor box recorded 2.25 times more triatomine faecal smears than its matched paper-sheet,and this relation increased with the density of bugs in the house. Both sensing devices were effective at monitoring unsuccessful attempts of peridomestic triatomine populations to colonize houses.