Artículo

Babino, A.; Makse, H.A.; DiTella, R.; Sigman, M. "Maintaining trust when agents can engage in self-deception" (2018) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115(35):8728-8733
Estamos trabajando para incorporar este artículo al repositorio
Consulte el artículo en la página del editor
Consulte la política de Acceso Abierto del editor

Abstract:

The coexistence of cooperation and selfish instincts is a remarkable characteristic of humans. Psychological research has unveiled the cognitive mechanisms behind self-deception. Two important findings are that a higher ambiguity about others’ social preferences leads to a higher likelihood of acting selfishly and that agents acting selfishly will increase their belief that others are also selfish. In this work, we posit a mathematical model of these mechanisms and explain their impact on the undermining of a global cooperative society. We simulate the behavior of agents playing a prisoner’s dilemma game in a random network of contacts. We endow each agent with these two self-deception mechanisms which bias her toward thinking that the other agent will defect. We study behavior when a fraction of agents with the “always defect” strategy is introduced in the network. Depending on the magnitude of the biases the players could start a cascade of defection or isolate the defectors. We find that there are thresholds above which the system approaches a state of complete distrust. © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Registro:

Documento: Artículo
Título:Maintaining trust when agents can engage in self-deception
Autor:Babino, A.; Makse, H.A.; DiTella, R.; Sigman, M.
Filiación:Departamento de Física J.J. Giambiagi, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, 1428, Argentina
Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, 1428, Argentina
Levich Institute, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, United States
Physics Department, City College of New York, New York, NY 10031, United States
Political Economy Group, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States
Social Interactions, Identity and Well-being Program, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada
Government and the International Economy Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA 02163, United States
Laboratorio de Neurociencia, CONICET, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires, C1428BIJ, Argentina
Palabras clave:Behavioral economics; Cognitive neuroscience; Cooperation; Corruption; Self-deception; article; behavioral economics; cognitive neuroscience; female; human; human experiment; prisoner dilemma; self evaluation; thinking; trust; cooperation; cultural anthropology; deception; prisoner dilemma; professional misconduct; theoretical model; Cooperative Behavior; Culture; Deception; Humans; Models, Theoretical; Prisoner Dilemma; Professional Misconduct
Año:2018
Volumen:115
Número:35
Página de inicio:8728
Página de fin:8733
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803438115
Título revista:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Título revista abreviado:Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
ISSN:00278424
CODEN:PNASA
Registro:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00278424_v115_n35_p8728_Babino

Referencias:

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R.H., Fairness and the assumptions of economics (1986) J Bus, 59, pp. S285-S300
  • Konow, J., Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation (2000) Am Econ Rev, 90, pp. 1072-1091
  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B., An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining (1982) J Econ Behav Organ, 3, pp. 367-388
  • Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M., A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation (1999) Q J Econ, 114, pp. 817-868
  • Festinger, L., (1962) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, 2. , Stanford Univ Press, Stanford, CA
  • Festinger, L., Carlsmith, J.M., Cognitive consequences of forced compliance (1959) J Abnorm Psychol, 58, pp. 203-210
  • Van Veen, V., Krug, M.K., Schooler, J.W., Carter, C.S., Neural activity predicts attitude change in cognitive dissonance (2009) Nat Neurosci, 12, pp. 1469-1474
  • Izuma, K., Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change (2010) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107, pp. 22014-22019
  • Rabin, M., (1995) Moral Preferences, Moral Constraints, and Self-Serving Biases, , Department of Economics, Univ of California, Berkeley
  • Di Tella, R., Perez-Truglia, R., Babino, A., Sigman, M., Conveniently upset: Avoiding altruism by distorting beliefs about others’ altruism (2015) Am Econ Rev, 105, pp. 3416-3442
  • Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., Prelec, D., Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences (2003) Q J Econ, 118, pp. 73-105
  • Ariely, D., Norton, M.I., How actions create—not just reveal—preferences (2008) Trends Cogn Sci, 12, pp. 13-16
  • Grujic, J., Fosco, C., Araujo, L., Cuesta, J.A., Sanchez, A., Social experiments in the mesoscale: Humans playing a spatial prisoner’s dilemma (2010) PLoS ONE, 5
  • Gracia-Lazaro, C., Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a prisoner’s dilemma (2012) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109, pp. 12922-12926
  • Mazar, N., Amir, O., Ariely, D., The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance (2008) J Mark Res, 45, pp. 633-644
  • Bear, A., Rand, D.G., Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation (2016) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 113, pp. 936-941
  • Hauk, E., Saez-Marti, M., On the cultural transmission of corruption (2002) J Econ Theor, 107, pp. 311-335
  • Tirole, J., A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality) (1996) Rev Econ Stud, 63, pp. 1-22
  • Bisin, A., Verdier, T., The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences (2001) J Econ Theor, 97, pp. 298-319
  • Sah, R.K., Corruption across countries and regions: Some consequences of local osmosis (2007) J Econ Dyn Control, 31, pp. 2573-2598
  • Levine, D.K., Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments (1998) Rev Econ Dyn, 1, pp. 593-622
  • Watts, D., A simple model of global cascades on random networks (2002) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99, pp. 5766-5771
  • Baxter, G.J., Dorogovtsev, S.N., Goltsev, A.V., Mendes, J.F.F., Bootstrap percolation on complex networks (2010) Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 82, pp. 1-9
  • Ramos, M., How does public opinion become extreme? (2015) Sci Rep, 5, p. 10032
  • Nowak, M.A., May, R.M., Evolutionary games and spatial chaos (1992) Nature, 359, pp. 826-829
  • Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H., Collective dynamics of’small-world’ networks (1998) Nature, 393, pp. 440-442
  • Newman, M.E., Strogatz, S.H., Watts, D.J., Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications (2001) Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys, 64, p. 026118
  • Gächter, S., Schulz, J.F., Intrinsic honesty and the prevalence of rule violations across societies (2016) Nature, 531, pp. 496-499
  • Fischbacher, U., Föllmi-Heusi, F., Lies in disguise - An experimental study on cheating (2013) J Eur Econ Assoc, 11, pp. 525-547
  • Nowak, M.A., Sasaki, A., Taylor, C., Fudenberg, D., Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations (2004) Nature, 428, pp. 646-650
  • Rand, D.G., Tarnita, C.E., Ohtsuki, H., Nowak, M.A., Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous ultimatum game (2013) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110, pp. 2581-2586
  • Griffiths, T.L., Tenenbaum, J.B., Optimal predictions in everyday cognition (2006) Psychol Sci, 17, pp. 767-773
  • Austerweil, J.L., Gershman, S.J., Tenenbaum, J.B., Griffiths, T.L., Structure and flexibility in Bayesian models of cognition (2015) Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology, pp. 187-208. , Oxford Univ Press, New York
  • Keizer, K., The spreading of disorder (2008) Science, 322, pp. 1681-1685

Citas:

---------- APA ----------
Babino, A., Makse, H.A., DiTella, R. & Sigman, M. (2018) . Maintaining trust when agents can engage in self-deception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(35), 8728-8733.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803438115
---------- CHICAGO ----------
Babino, A., Makse, H.A., DiTella, R., Sigman, M. "Maintaining trust when agents can engage in self-deception" . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, no. 35 (2018) : 8728-8733.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803438115
---------- MLA ----------
Babino, A., Makse, H.A., DiTella, R., Sigman, M. "Maintaining trust when agents can engage in self-deception" . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 115, no. 35, 2018, pp. 8728-8733.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803438115
---------- VANCOUVER ----------
Babino, A., Makse, H.A., DiTella, R., Sigman, M. Maintaining trust when agents can engage in self-deception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018;115(35):8728-8733.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803438115