Navegar

Colección

Datos Estadísticas

Artículo

La versión final de este artículo es de uso interno. El editor solo permite incluir en el repositorio el artículo en su versión post-print. Por favor, si usted la posee enviela a
Consulte el artículo en la página del editor
Consulte la política de Acceso Abierto del editor

Abstract:

Two complementary decoherence formalisms, Environment Induced Decoherence (EID) for open systems and Self Induced Decoherence (SID) for close systems are compared under a common General Theoretical Formalism for Decoherence (GTFD). The differences and similarities of EID and SID are studied, e. g. that the main difference is that EID only considers the relevant information of the proper system S and neglects the rest, while SID considers all possible information available from a certain class of measurement instruments and neglects the non-available information. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Registro:

Documento: Artículo
Título:Formal Features of a General Theoretical Framework for Decoherence in Open and Closed Systems
Autor:Castagnino, M.; Fortin, S.
Filiación:CONICET, IAFE (CONICET-UBA), IFIR and FCEN (University of Buenos Aires), Buenos Aires, Argentina
CONICET, IAFE (CONICET-UBA) and FCEN (University of Buenos Aires), Buenos Aires, Argentina
Palabras clave:Decoherence; Decoherence time; Preferred basis; Relaxation time
Año:2013
Volumen:52
Número:5
Página de inicio:1379
Página de fin:1398
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-012-1456-4
Título revista:International Journal of Theoretical Physics
Título revista abreviado:Int. J. Theor. Phys.
ISSN:00207748
Registro:https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/paper/document/paper_00207748_v52_n5_p1379_Castagnino

Referencias:

  • Castagnino, M., (2008) Class. Quantum Gravity, 25. , 154002
  • Castagnino, M., Fortin, S., (2011) Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 26, p. 2365
  • Omnés, R., (2002) Phys. Rev. A, 65. , 052119
  • Omnés, R., (2001) Decoherence: An irreversible process, , arXiv: quant-ph/0106006v1
  • Lombardi, O., Fortin, S., Castagnino, M., The problem of identifying the system and the environment in the phenomenon of decoherence (2012) Philosophical Issues in the Sciences, 3, pp. 161-174. , H. W. Regtde, S. Hartmann, and S. Okasha (Eds.), Berlin: Springer
  • Castagnino, M., Laura, R., (1997) Phys. Rev. A, 56, pp. 108-119
  • Laura, R., Castagnino, M., (1998) Phys. Rev. A, 57, pp. 4140-4152
  • Laura, R., Castagnino, M., (1998) Phys. Rev. E, 57, pp. 3948-3961
  • Castagnino, M., (1999) Int. J. Theor. Phys., 38, pp. 1333-1348
  • Castagnino, M., Laura, R., (2000) Phys. Rev. A, 62. , 022107
  • Castagnino, M., Laura, R., (2000) Int. J. Theor. Phys., 39, pp. 1737-1765
  • Castagnino, M., Lombardi, O., (2003) Int. J. Theor. Phys., 42, pp. 1281-1299
  • Castagnino, M., (2004) Physica A, 335, p. 511
  • Castagnino, M., Ordoñez, A., (2004) Int. J. Theor. Phys., 43, pp. 695-719
  • Castagnino, M., Gadella, M., (2006) Found. Phys., 36, pp. 920-952
  • van Hove, L., (1957) Physica, 23, p. 441
  • van Hove, L., (1959) Physica, 25, p. 268
  • Castagnino, M., Fortin, S., (2011) Int. J. Theor. Phys., 50, pp. 2259-2267
  • Paz, J.P., Zurek, W.H., Environment-induced decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical (2002) Lecture Notes in Physics, 587. , D. Heiss (Ed.), Heidelberg: Springer
  • Zurek, W.H., Preferred sets of states, predictability, classicality and environment-induced decoherence (1982) Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, 26, pp. 1862-1880. , J. J. Halliwell, J. Pérez-Mercader, and W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Zurek, W.H., (1982) Phys. Rev. D, 26, pp. 1862-1880
  • Zurek, W.H., (1993) Prog. Theor. Phys., 89, p. 281
  • Zurek, W.H., (2003) Rev. Mod. Phys., 75, p. 715
  • Zurek, W.H., Preferred sets of states, predictability, classicality and environment-induced decoherence (1994) Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry, , J. J. Halliwell, J. Pérez-Mercader, and W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Zurek, W.H., (1998) Decoherence, einselection, and the existential interpretation, , arXiv: quant-ph/9805065
  • Knill, E., Laflamme, R., Barnum, H., Dalvit, D., Dziarmaga, J., Gubernatis, J., Gurvits, L., Zurek, W.H., (2002) Los Alamos Sci., 27, p. 2
  • Castagnino, M., Lombardi, O., (2004) Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys., 35, p. 73
  • Mackey, M.C., (1989) Rev. Mod. Phys., 61, pp. 981-1015
  • Schlosshauer, M., (2007) Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition, , Berlin: Springer
  • Antoniou, I., Suchanecki, Z., Laura, R., Tasaki, S.Z., (1997) Physica A, 241, pp. 737-772
  • Castagnino, M., Gailoli, F., Gunzig, E., (1996) Found. Cosmic Phys., 16, pp. 221-375
  • Nakajima, S., (1958) Prog. Theor. Phys., 20, pp. 948-959
  • Zwanzig, R., (1960) J. Chem. Phys., 33, p. 1338
  • Castagnino, M., Fortin, S., (2012) J. Phys. A, Math. Theor., 45. , 444009
  • Castagnino, M., Fortin, S., (2010) On a possible definition of the moving preferred basis, , arXiv: 1009. 0535v2
  • Zeh, H.D., (1992) The Physical Basis of the Direction of Time, , Berlin: Springer
  • Bleistein, N., Handelsman, R., (1986) Asymptotic Expansion of Integrals, , New York: Dover
  • Casati, G., Prosen, T., (2005) Phys. Rev. A, 72. , 032111
  • Castagnino, M., (2004) Physica A, 335, pp. 511-517
  • Castagnino, M., Ordoñez, A., (2005) Int. J. Theor. Phys., 43, pp. 695-719
  • Halvorson, H., Algebraic quantum field theory (2007) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Physics, Part A, , eprint: arXiv:math-ph/0602036v1, J. Butter and J. Earman (Eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier
  • Bratteli, O., Robinson, D., (1979) Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics I, , Berlin: Springer
  • Ballentine, L.E., (1990) Quantum Mechanics, , New York: Prentice Hall
  • Trèves, A., (1967) Topological Vector Space, Distribution and Kernels, , New York: Academic Press
  • Iguri, S.M., Castagnino, M.A., (2008) J. Math. Phys., 49. , 033510
  • Castagnino, M., Ordóñez, A., Algebraic formulation of quantum decoherence (2004) Int. J. Math. Phys., 43, pp. 695-719
  • Castagnino, M., Lombardi, O., (2004) Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., 35, pp. 73-107
  • Bohm, A., (1986) Quantum Mechanics, Foundations and Applications, , Berlin: Springer
  • Castagnino, M., Laura, R., (2000) Phys. Rev. A, 62. , 022107
  • Castagnino, M., Fortin, S., (2012) Defining the moving preferred basis in closed systems, , in preparation
  • Castagnino, M., Lombardi, O., (2005) Phys. Rev. A, 72. , 012102
  • Castagnino, M., Laura, R., (2000) Int. J. Theor. Phys., 39, pp. 1737-1765
  • Gambini, R., Pulin, J., (2007) Found. Phys., 37, p. 7
  • Gambini, R., Porto, R.A., Pulin, J., (2007) Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 39, p. 8
  • Gambini, R., Pulin, J., Modern space-time and undecidability (2010) Fundamental Theories of Physics (Minkowski Spacetime: A Hundred Years Later), 165. , V. Petkov (Ed.), Heidelberg: Springer
  • Castagnino, M., Lombardi, O., (2009) Physica A, 388, pp. 247-267
  • Lombardi, O., Castagnino, M., (2008) Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci., 39, pp. 380-443
  • Castagnino, M., Lombardi, O., (2008) J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 128. , 012014
  • Rothe, C., Hintschich, S.I., Monkman, A.P., (2006) Phys. Rev. Lett., 96. , 163601

Citas:

---------- APA ----------
Castagnino, M. & Fortin, S. (2013) . Formal Features of a General Theoretical Framework for Decoherence in Open and Closed Systems. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 52(5), 1379-1398.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-012-1456-4
---------- CHICAGO ----------
Castagnino, M., Fortin, S. "Formal Features of a General Theoretical Framework for Decoherence in Open and Closed Systems" . International Journal of Theoretical Physics 52, no. 5 (2013) : 1379-1398.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-012-1456-4
---------- MLA ----------
Castagnino, M., Fortin, S. "Formal Features of a General Theoretical Framework for Decoherence in Open and Closed Systems" . International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 52, no. 5, 2013, pp. 1379-1398.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-012-1456-4
---------- VANCOUVER ----------
Castagnino, M., Fortin, S. Formal Features of a General Theoretical Framework for Decoherence in Open and Closed Systems. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2013;52(5):1379-1398.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-012-1456-4