Abstract:
In this Reply, to the preceding, Comment of Mayer, we indicate that there is no reason to prefer Mayer's definitions to ours (or conversely) when in the usual range of validity. © 1984.
Referencias:
- Mayer, (1984) Chem. Phys. Letters, 110, p. 440
- Natiello, Medrano, (1984) Chem. Phys. Letters, 105, p. 180
- Mayer, (1983) Chem. Phys. Letters, 97, p. 270
- Wilberg, Application of the pople-santry-segal CNDO method to the cyclopropylcarbinyl and cyclobutyl cation and to bicyclobutane (1966) Tetrahedron, 24, p. 1083
- Armstrong, Perkins, Stewart, Bond indices and valency (1973) Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, p. 838
- M.A. Natiello, H.F. Reale and J.A. Medrano, to be published; M.S. de Giambiagi, M. Giambiagi and F.E. Jorge, preprint, CBPF, NF 008/84, Río de Janeíro, Brasil (1984)
Citas:
---------- APA ----------
Natiello, M.A. & Medrano, J.A.
(1984)
. Reply to "comments on the quantum theory of valence and bonding: Choosing between alternative definitions". Chemical Physics Letters, 110(4), 445-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(84)85462-7---------- CHICAGO ----------
Natiello, M.A., Medrano, J.A.
"Reply to "comments on the quantum theory of valence and bonding: Choosing between alternative definitions""
. Chemical Physics Letters 110, no. 4
(1984) : 445-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(84)85462-7---------- MLA ----------
Natiello, M.A., Medrano, J.A.
"Reply to "comments on the quantum theory of valence and bonding: Choosing between alternative definitions""
. Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 110, no. 4, 1984, pp. 445-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(84)85462-7---------- VANCOUVER ----------
Natiello, M.A., Medrano, J.A. Reply to "comments on the quantum theory of valence and bonding: Choosing between alternative definitions". Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984;110(4):445-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(84)85462-7